How can CAD file formats support your design workflow?
Learn from the community’s knowledge. Experts are adding insights into this AI-powered collaborative article, and you could too.
This is a new type of article that we started with the help of AI, and experts are taking it forward by sharing their thoughts directly into each section.
If you’d like to contribute, request an invite by liking or reacting to this article. Learn more
— The LinkedIn Team
If you work with computer-aided design (CAD), you know that there are many different file formats that you can use to create, edit, and share your designs. But how do you choose the right format for your project and workflow? And how do you ensure compatibility and quality across different platforms and applications? Explore some of the common CAD file formats and how they can support your design process and workflow.
Native vs. Neutral Formats
One of the first distinctions you need to make when working with CAD file formats is between native and neutral formats. Native formats are specific to the software that created them, such as .dwg for AutoCAD or .sldprt for SolidWorks. They contain all the data and features of your design, but they may not be compatible with other software or devices. Neutral formats are more universal and can be opened by different software, such as .step or .iges for 3D models or .dxf or .pdf for 2D drawings. They are useful for exchanging and exporting your design, but they may lose some data or quality in the process.
-
It’s important to identify when to use Neutral and Native formats within different types of work: If the goal is to share a document or file with others for viewing or printing purposes without the need for further editing or specific software requirements, a neutral format like PDF would be appropriate. On the other hand, if collaboration, advanced editing, or utilizing specialized features is essential, opting for a native format compatibility would be needed, such as working on a file within a company setting or working within a university
Choosing the Right Format
The format of your design is determined by various factors, such as the purpose, scope, complexity, and audience of your project. For instance, if you are creating a detailed 3D model that requires parametric editing and simulation, you may opt for a native format that preserves all the information and functionality. Alternatively, if you are sharing a basic 2D sketch with a client or colleague, you may use a neutral format that can be easily viewed and printed. When deciding on a format, consider questions such as: what is the goal of your design? What is the level of detail and accuracy? Decide the size and complexity. Determine which software and devices will be used to access your design. And know the quality and performance requirements.
-
I believe it's more important to choose CAD based on your needs, not suppliers or contractors. Select a CAD program that you are familiar with and want to grow with. This way, you also preserve your IP by not broadcasting your design philosophy. Granted, a good CAD user can reverse engineer any design, but don't make it easy for them by showing your feature history. Also, it maintains a level of security by freezing the design, so there is little or no chance that the supplier mistakenly changes a dimension or feature. This reduces or eliminates costly errors and disputes. In 30 years of CAD use, I only collaborated directly with a vendor once or twice with native files. The other 99.9% of the time, it was always neutral files.
Converting and Exporting Formats
Sometimes, you may need to convert or export your design from one format to another in order to make it compatible with another software or device, or to optimize it for a specific purpose. For example, you may want to convert a 3D model from .step to .stl for 3D printing, or export a 2D drawing from .dwg to .pdf for online sharing. There are different methods of conversion or export, such as using the built-in tools of your CAD software, a third-party software, or an online service. However, be aware that this process may result in some data or quality loss, such as missing features, reduced resolution or accuracy, and increased file size. Therefore, always check and verify your converted or exported design before using or sharing it to ensure it meets your expectations and requirements.
-
There is possibility of changing solid model to surface model during conversation of 3D model is common issue. More careful in the 3D model conversation in all CAD platforms.
Managing and Organizing Formats
When working with CAD file formats, it is important to manage and organize them effectively to avoid confusion, duplication, or errors in the design process and workflow. To do this, you should name your files clearly and consistently, creating a file structure and hierarchy with folders and subfolders to group and categorize them. Additionally, it is important to back up and archive your files regularly, as well as update and synchronize them frequently. This can be done through version control, collaboration tools, external drives, cloud storage, or other methods to save and protect your files from loss or damage.
-
i switch between UGNX and CATIA currently as CATIA for modelling and UGNX for CAE and CAD work. Format followed in common while switching is .stp . BUt tolerance place big role , CATIA we should keep .005 and Ugnx 0.001 . but in previous organization 0.05 is kept for CATIA as tolerance. Tolerance is important and next is format plus the LICENSE to open the format which we received. but better all the people work in CAD CAM CAE from the same company for more ACCURACY and less trouble.
Learning and Improving Formats
To make the most of CAD file formats and support your design process and workflow, it is essential to stay up-to-date with the latest trends and developments. To do this, you can read and research different formats and their advantages and disadvantages online. Experimenting and testing with different formats and their settings or options is also helpful. Compare and evaluate different formats using quality criteria or performance indicators, as well as learning best practices from experts or peers through online courses or webinars.
-
In my experience, I rarely see design engineers or drafters experimenting with newer file formats unless they are mandated to do so. This is because firms usually have a set process or format which will be followed throughout the company. It is not recommended to change them unless there is a strong business or technical reason to it. Also, while changing the file format for a model or drawing to new, the existing models and drawings would still be in older format (maintaining two different formats or converting all to single format). This would pose a challenge when opening or creating assemblies with multiple child parts and also when trying to applying constraints to the assemblies. These are the reasons why experimenting is a challenge.
Here’s what else to consider
This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?
-
In our applications, both the numerical and geometrical tolerances were important. Therefore we were producing technical drawings in addition to the 3D files of the object. Different 3D design computer programs were able to produce these drawings, directly from the 3D file. But when we tried to add tolerances and templates on these drawings, we found many difficulties. There, we found ways to solve these problems, but it is preferable to have a software, that can convert 3D file directly and paint it on tour own company template format and allows you to add numerical and geometrical tolerances and notes to be written on these sheets. This is an important issue.